LATEST NEWS
March 2026
Welcome to the Age of Being
A quiet shift is taking place.
People everywhere are beginning to sense that accumulation alone cannot satisfy the deeper hunger of the human spirit. We have reached a moment where the old formula — work, acquire, compete, repeat — feels increasingly hollow.
We have entered what could be called the Age of Having in its final form.
The world has more information than ever before.
More technology than ever before.
More capacity than any civilisation that preceded it.
Yet many people feel strangely disconnected from themselves.
Why?
Because knowledge alone is not transformation.
You can know many things and remain fundamentally unchanged.
You can accumulate facts, skills, and credentials and still remain trapped inside the same patterns of thought and behaviour.
Knowledge, by itself, does not transform the human being.
But being does.
This is why the phrase carries such weight:
You can know and not be.
But you cannot be and not know.
SOCIAL MEDIA DISRUPTION
Deletion of Facebook accounts.
On the 4th February 2026, all my Facebook pages (over 10 years worth of work), were taken down by Facebook. Considering the thousands of hours invested and the quality of work, this is a serious breach of ethics. But, since when have zionists ever been ethical?
"Community standards" is another word for containment. A failed regime trying tp stem the tide of truth. But cutting out a mans tongue does not prove him a liar. All it proves is that you were too weak to listen to the message. Weak regimes use a hammer, because it is the only tool in their toolbox.
Before my account got deleted I was posting the last of the architectural primers. These documents describe how the quantum field and the human interface work. My most recent release, aptly titled All You Can Meat contains a full overview of the entire circuit and how it functions.
Mark's "Community Standards".
ARCHITECTURAL PRIMER SERIES
PRIMA FACIE: The Evidentiary Architecture of Living Systems is a structured examination of how living systems actually work — not as they are described by belief, ideology, or authority, but as they are revealed through behaviour, consequence, and time.
Across a sequence of tightly ordered primers, it traces the underlying mechanics that govern learning, responsibility, authority, and maturity in any system capable of sustaining life. Biology, psychology, civilisation, scripture, and technology are treated not as separate domains, but as different languages describing the same architectural constraints.
At its core, the book asks a single question:
Can life govern itself without external control once fully exposed to consequence?
Everything in the work is oriented toward answering that question — not through assertion or persuasion, but through cumulative evidence.
What Makes This Book Different
-
It does not rely on belief, ideology, or moral framing
-
It does not persuade, instruct, or reassure
-
It does not divide people into identities or camps
Instead, it follows a prima facie approach: a chain of evidence built over time, where no single claim is decisive, but coherence emerges when the whole structure is seen.
Living systems rely on feedback, consequence, and internal alignment. When these architectures are confused or merged, collapse is not a moral failure — it is a structural one.
I'm The Guy Who Programmed ChatGPT
I Am the Guy Who Programmed ChatGPT begins with a provocative headline and unfolds into something far deeper: an exploration of how artificial intelligence reveals the posture of the people who use it.
The title emerged from a viral social media experiment, but the book quickly moves beyond the headline to examine a much larger cultural shift. In an age of instant answers and algorithmic authority, Richards asks a disarming question: what happens to human judgment when thinking is increasingly outsourced to machines?
Rather than treating artificial intelligence as either salvation or threat, Richards approaches it as a mirror. The machine does not create intelligence, he argues—it reflects the orientation of the user. Some approach AI as an oracle, seeking quick answers and external authority. Others use it as a collaborator, applying pressure to their own thinking and refining ideas through friction.
Drawing on examples from social media culture, platform censorship, anonymity, and attention markets, the book examines how speed, convenience, and verification systems are subtly reshaping how people interpret reality. The result is a powerful argument that the real issue is not technological but developmental.
Part philosophical reflection, part cultural diagnosis, and part personal narrative, I Am the Guy Who Programmed ChatGPT invites readers to ask a simple but profound question:
Are we programming our tools — or are our tools quietly programming us?
